Return To Message Board
Author Topic:   for gene
Tabby676 posted 10/6/02 4:28 PM     Click here to send email to Tabby676  
The Tolken/druidic connection is not nearly as strong as the Tolken misc. ancient British/Irish throw back of general superstition and fairy tale links in his works. Wizards were mostly (by that name) are an ancient British thing, and the Fae (faeries as immortals who are thin tall and far better at warring than humans let alone due to their age far more knowledgeable or wise) are a mainly Irish train of thought, (the root of this myth was due to previous settling in Ireland by Anglo-Saxons who were more technologically advanced then the Irish people in general at the time). The list goes on and on from here, magic items imbued with a power that they give to their wearer or carrier, slaying dragons, etc. As I stated previously stated however no 2 wiccans will ever truly agree on what wicca is so I would assume that some wiccans would say that the middle earth series is close to a religious doctrine while others would laugh at the thought. Yes I have been to funerals and, though I do understand the purpose of the ritual of viewing a loved ones body in a public place it having been mutilated to give it the closest appearance to life as possible, I find the whole thing disturbing and rather barbaric and generally creepy. My fiancé’s father died when he was 22 years old, (6 years ago), he had had a massive heart attack and had basically crushed his head on the bath room sink; so I am sure you can imagine the body was not in good condition; his surviving family members showed anger and outrage to the fact that he refused to, “kiss his father good bye”, at the viewing. I know that I am mortal; I hope that I never have a funeral though... Another religion you may be interested in though information in English is still rather scarce is Japanese shintoism though this comes far closer to just general spirituality than a religion the thing that has always fascinated me about this religion is how close it comes to describing the bas concept of e=mc2 in a basic ancient manner of description. Those who believe in shintoism believe that everything from a rock to you to a chair a blade of grass etc has a living spirit and that these spirits are all linked and that they are somehow aware of one another especially when in close proximity and that the spirits are old and wise and cannot die… Unfortunately all of the rituals of shinto mostly revolve around hand washing, which I can understand with such a large population on such a small island, it just holds little meaning to me personally. The creation myth is interesting as well, historically speaking, it goes something like this, in the beginning there was the heavens and the earth (paraphrasing) and the goddess had a chosen people, to make a special place for these chosen people she dipped her sword into the water and where it toughed were created the sacred islands of Nippon, and told the people that they must stay on this island and they would be forever in her favor. The reason I say this is interesting, is that the Japanese as we know them today are not the original inhabitants of Japan but rather of Chinese descent, splitters if you will, but this does sound to me at least like what it would have appeared as from far off of China’s shores, (too far off to see from the shore), when the ring of fire made Japan to begin with, (lightening is often associated with volcanoes). Anyway I am needlessly verbose and will give it a rest for a moment…
Gene posted 10/6/02 5:06 PM    
You're not needlessly verbose, Tabby.
I, on the other hand, have been on a
jabber jag for several days and can't
seem to slow down. But gawd, you always
answer my questions with great
intellegence. I'm learning good stuff
from you and appreciate the experience.
(More than I can say about the brave
matthew; I think I'll choose not to
capitalize his name. Thanks for not
getting turned-on by animal torture,
then blaming me, the way matthew does.)
I agree there is a very morbid twist to
many funerals. Most of my family is
rural Southern and have a tradition of
taking photos of corpses dressed out in
funeral finery to send to relatives who
couldn't attend, or for their own
scrapbooks. As I was growing up, I
never knew what I might find in letters
from berieved relatives. My own family
album has a photo of my two-year-old
brother's funeral clearly showing tire
tracks across his face. I've attended
backwoods hillbilly funerals that would
make Faulkner wince. If you think most
embalming is bad, check out a dead
hillbilly on an August day in an
un-airconditioned country church with no
window screens, while a fire and
brimstone preacher hollers for hours
till everyone is crying. But these are
exceptions. To be perfectly honest, I
like funerals. But not in a morbid way.
I consider funerals one of society's
most important rituals. Good funerals
honor the life of the deceased, give
loved ones community support and the
opportunity to join together, and
demonstrate, firsthand, that there isn't
much to a body if the spirit is gone. I
always worried about seeing my father's
body, but was elated by the experience;
it was obvious that the body in the box
had nothing to do with him. All that
mattered was his spirit.
Tabby676 posted 10/6/02 8:03 PM     Click here to send email to Tabby676  
I am an encyclopedia of useless information Gene by all means please use me, as you will. J In terms of me not being like most pledges of peta2 I attribute this purely to my age though I am not that old at 25 I realized several years ago that standing on a soap box and yelling at people while they yell back is no way to have a long lasting effect on the state of society, or at least not an effect that I would truly want to have. I would actually, (if forced to label myself and conscribe to the concept set forth by someone else’s web site which is terribly limiting in and of itself), be more like those who write for vegan.com though I prefer to be the author of my own treatise, which is ever-changing and malleable. Honestly though I understand why the people at peta2 are the way they are just as I understand the people on this board, and even petasucks.cc and judge none, each person must eventually define how they are going to be personally and this often if not always involves a lack of understanding of why everyone else around them does not see the same things the same way, many people never advance beyond this point and that makes me sad, because while I do understand why this happens, to plateau there is to miss out on truly learning anything beyond your own sphere of influence and that seems to me not unlike death itself. The behavior that go along with this manner of thinking scuttle any opportunity to find common ground there by knowing your neighbor and possibly leading by example or at least just getting to know another individual that could be a a great friend or ally. Anyway that is my thought for the day, or at least for this moment of the day.
Gene posted 10/7/02 0:37 AM    
Sorry for the long post. The absence of
paragraph breaks and my tall, skinny
malfunction makes it appear worse than
it is, much like a funhouse mirror.
Slashes separate paragraphs:///////////
It's refreshing to encounter a PeTA
advocate with your intelligence and
good, common sense, Tabby. I've been at
this for a while and have corresponded
with only one other PeTA supporter who
has impressed me: a middle-aged woman
from southwestern Ohio who posted as
Hopalong on another forum. Her
intelligence, charm, and openness
captivated everyone who debated her, and
she reminded us that not everyone on the
PeTA lines are brainwashed zombies. I'm
well aware that PeTA2 represents mostly
teenagers and, frankly, I maintain more
compassion towards them than for the
rank-and-file PeTA lieutenants I usually
butt against. I also realize that it's
normal for teenagers to talk trash and
be nasty about everything in their
lives./////////////////
I never thought much about PeTA until
the past year, when I began meeting many
PeTA activists on Internet debate
boards. My shock from hearing their
points-of-view, or shall I say,
point-of-view, prompted me to begin
exploring their websites and printed
literature. Until then, like most
liberal Americans, I had assumed PeTA
was basically a well-intentioned group
of people devoted to animal welfare.
But the more I found out about PeTA, the
more I became alarmed. My past several
weeks browsing the PeTA2 site has
deepened my despair about their
influence on young people, who have so
little firsthand experience with the
subjects they feel so strongly
about.///////////////
I've grown to consider PeTA a cult.
Familiarity with a group of people
usually leads to a growing understanding
and respect, but between me and PeTA,
it's been the extreme opposite. This
hasn't happened to me often. I spent
the 70s and 80s living in Harvard
Square, Cambridge, the Haight Ashbury of
the East. The early 70s were wild
times: sex, drugs, and rock & roll with
apparently no price to pay for
overindulgence. It was an Austin Powers
world, baby! By the early 70s, many
people felt unfulfilled by radical
politics and began searching for new
philosophies and pursuits.
Cambridge/Boston was a delicatessen of
alternative groups merging into a New
Age groundswell; you could dip your
spoon in any direction and bring back
something interesting or trippy. It was
a cornucopia! Many of my friends were
joining meditation groups and religious
ashrams. Every form of Buddhism had
become popular, especially Tantric; Hare
Krishnas, of course, were everywhere,
beating drums and always in your face,
hands out, but joyous (their founder was
still alive, but everything changed with
his death); Scientology was getting a
toehold, much later, EST hit the scene;
nutritional philosophies like
Macrobiotics were becoming poular, while
others lived on vitamins only, and
others Fruitarians; Satanists and
Witchcraft groups; plus countless
others. On and on. Anyway, I had a
front row seat to much of the party. I
never joined any group, which is my
nature, but attended many introductory
lectures and more. To make a long story
a bit shorter, I found most of these
groups pretty benign; but I'll never
forget attending meetings of a few
groups that scared the holy crap out of
me, and PeTA makes me feel the same
way.//////////////////
I haven't eaten red meat in 32 years,
but it never occurred to me to hate the
rest of the world for not making an
identical decision at the exact same
time as me. Plus, I grew up on a farm
and know agricultural people aren't the
bloodthirsty beasts PeTA dictates
everyone must believe. I've been living
in Santa Fe for the past dozen years and
now know many ranch and rodeo families.
Being a magazine and book photographer
has provided me the opportunity to go
anywhere I want, and I've been so
inspired by the real cowboy's amazing
partnership with animals and connection
to the land that I've been documenting
their world for several years. For
anyone to claim that these people
torture animals is outrageous beyond
belief! PeTA's savage lies about my
good friends have mobilized me to
challenge PeTA propoganda at every
opportunity. I believe PeTA is a cult
exploiting mainstream America's
alienation from agricultural reality. I
have found PeTA's slander beyond all
common decency and don't believe they
are an animal welfare charity by any
stretch of the imagination. I think
their motivations are self-righteousness
and money. How can I respect a group
that only preaches disrespect and
censors all debate within their ranks,
then hides behind a free speech defense
when challenged by their victims?
Mostly, why do they teach their
followers to hate all who disgree with
their radical philosophy? Why do they
turn children against their own family
and community? It appears that PeTA's
strategy is convincing followers that
the world is pure poison and only they
have the antidote, that only PeTA is a
safe haven in a nightmare world of
bloody cruelty. I almost never use the
word evil, but I've become convinced,
after a very long road, that PeTA is
evil. I know many vegans who agree.
PeTA has no vision - only blackness.
Comic Red Skelton said that TV pl
Gene posted 10/7/02 0:45 AM    
Crap! Dang this machine!///// Comic
Red Skelton said that TV plays violent
shows to scare people from leaving their
homes, so they watch more TV. I think
PeTA must be Red Skelton fans.


Tabby676 posted 10/7/02 2:18 AM     Click here to send email to Tabby676  
Hey Gene this is completely off topic, but I am flippant about topics when not asked a direct question, guess that is part of the MTV upbringing. I would like to invite you as a photographer, (if you are ever in Atlanta), to come and see part of my world, though like you I am not directly affiliated with any group I am very active in the fetish community and in fact as a second job I am a performer in a fetish club. It is an incredibly liberal and intellectual environment and not the swinger freak party many would have it be, but it is also visually fascinating, just the clothing alone, I would think anyway, would make it quite the smorgasbord for capture on film. If you ever are in town and would like to come see the visual spectrum that is the fetish underground let me know, my email addy is suriyel676@mindspring.com
Return To Message Board

Post New Topic