|
| Author | Topic: CAN WE ACCEPT ADOLF HITLER AS A SAINT? |
| MICK FOLEY |
posted 4/12/06 4:02 PM
CAN WE ACCEPT ADOLF HITLER AS A SAINT? |
| yo_mamma |
posted 4/13/06 8:13 AM
What a stupid frikkin question. That the best you can do? |
| Slayer |
posted 4/15/06 2:44 PM
it's enough that he killed alot of jews...so he is a saint |
| yo_mamma |
posted 4/16/06 0:18 AM
OK, that makes two fukkin' morons. Anyone else? |
| Your Worst Nightmare |
posted 4/25/06 1:50 PM
You're right. I reckon homicidal maniacs should all be saints.YOU MORON.Perhaps we should gas you for no reason other than your race and see how you like it. Then make whoever did it a saint... yes that's a much better idea. |
| the listener.. |
posted 4/27/06 1:01 AM
guess they did not understand the question... but I dont believe in saints,but he did make us look at us ,for that...well guess he made us sit up and listen.Maybe the question should be ...did we listen? |
| JOHN BELUSHI |
posted 5/11/06 2:06 PM
SIEG HEIL !!!HEIL HITLER !!! |
| the listener.. |
posted 5/14/06 1:43 AM
as there is only "one"of us, lets hope we listened |
| nameless |
posted 6/17/06 4:53 AM
Hahahahahaha... If there's only One of 'us' (then who's the 'us' for there to be One of??), then who (plural?!) is 'hoping' that whom (plural?!) is listening? -Brought to you by ~Neo-Advaitan 'Stickiness'~~~ *__- |
| the listener |
posted 7/8/06 1:45 AM
nice play on "words" enjoyed reading yours, but have to admit did not excpect your last words ...another learning for me ! excpect only the unexpected ...or your ego |
| Enthusiast |
posted 4/28/07 7:59 AM
While reading all of your explanations about if we can accept Adolph Hitler as a saint or not, I noticed some inconsistent beliefs. And noticed that you all are attacking all the horrible orders and beliefs he stood for. But that was not what Mick Foley was asking. Instead interpret the question as, Can Adolph Hitler could be seen as a saint? This way it opens it up to other options.Adolph was a spectacular leader. He was a clergyman of, what some can call a church. He was a leader of this church and helped to develop the beliefs that the Nazi's stood by and practiced. After WWI there were many problems in Germany along with the rest of the world, like there is today. But their thoughts were that the Jews had a lot to do with these problems they were facing. Also, the Marxist political group was becoming stronger and fear of a communist revolution became a possible reality. Linking the Marxist and the Jews together solved this problem. This was the start of the 25 points of the German Workers Party (Nazis). With a couple hundred people believing these ideals, word spread, creating thousands of followers. It became a religious and political belief with order and lack of selfishness. These are two characteristics that can be used to describe a Saint. Hitler became known for these attributes and called a Saint. This is where our common sense kicks in and controls our thoughts, "A Saint for all that torture and pain. Never. Not true. He was insane." However who says what he stood for was right or wrong? Yes he did cause a lot of pain to innocent people. But when the question of right or wrong comes into play we have to stay consistent with our believes and what we preach. And I to believe what Nameless mentioned in the form, is there really a good and evil? Nameless pronounced his option by writing, “Of course not, how can there be? People recognize 'good' as that which makes them (individually and subjectively) feel 'better', more 'comfortable'. 'Evil' does the opposite. Shallow judgments.” So if we want to say consistent good and evil varies individually and subjectively from person to person. Under these circumstances Hitler was raised differently and believed the good for all was through fallowing the 25 points of the German Workers Party. Therefore, Hitler could be seen as a Saint, just not in my eyes. I won’t over well you with to much. Ha Ha. Peace Y’all. |
| ez |
posted 8/26/07 0:47 AM
certain aspects of hitler were admireable. His philosophy(other than the whole extermination thing) is very logically sound. his downfall was the application thereof. |
|
|