|
| Author | Topic: Ehrlich wants to end the Glendening-era Office of Smart Growth |
| Harry Hagedorn |
posted 2/4/04 3:10 PM
By David Nitkin Sun Staff Originally published February 4, 2004 Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. wants to abolish the state Office of Smart Growth and fold its sprawl-fighting functions into the Department of Planning, erasing one of the most visible initiatives of his immediate predecessor. In legislation introduced this week, the Department of Planning proposed eliminating what was once a 15-person office, created in 2001 as then-Gov. Parris N. Glendening was pushing Maryland to the forefront of the national anti-sprawl movement. Planning department officials say they can accomplish those tasks at lower cost. But environmental activists say the proposal raises fresh questions about Ehrlich's commitment to land preservation and the revitalization of older communities, which have been objectives of the land-use strategy. "I think there's some important symbolism," said Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, a Washington-area advocacy group. "It downgrades the role of smart growth in the state." Some lawmakers said they were worried about the proposal, hopeful that Maryland would not be relinquishing the leadership position that Glendening helped forge. "I am concerned," said Del. Mary-Dulany James, a Harford County Democrat. "We are going to have to keep an eye on this." But Chuck Gates, spokesman for the Department of Planning, said the Ehrlich administration was not giving up on effective land-use principles. "I can see how it might be viewed that way, but in fact there is not a reduction in emphasis or a reduction in services," Gates said. "I don't know of any other state that has a separate entity whose primary purpose was smart growth." Gates could not say yesterday how much money would be saved through the move. Five staffers would work on Smart Growth issues, he said, compared with a high of 15 when the office was running at full capacity with positions borrowed from other agencies. Ehrlich's decision comes a year after his administration defended the office when General Assembly analysts proposed its elimination. "It is the one office that is charged with the task of looking out for the 'big picture' and trying to assure that what the state is doing in land use is sustainable over the long run," according to written testimony provided to legislative budget committees last year. "What we do is the tough job of being a neutral coordinator between agencies by keeping the focus on a Smart Growth outcome." Susan Brown, head of the League of Conservation Voters, said she was "not sure if the Department of Planning will be able to do that, not being an independent coordinating body." The office's demise was foreshadowed last spring, when several employees were fired. Since then, Ehrlich issued an executive order renaming the Smart Growth strategy as Priority Places, but details of the new program are not fully known, Brown and others say. "The real loss is the people that they just willy-nilly fired," said Dru Schmidt-Perkins, head of 1,000 Friends of Maryland. "They were some of the best and the brightest in the country to be working on these issues. That loss of resources is what is important here." http://www.sunspot.net/news/local/bal-md.smartgrowth04feb04,0,2449209.story?coll=bal-pe-maryland sunspot.net |
| Steve Cook |
posted 4/15/04 3:39 AM
Smart growth needs to stay a separate entity for emphsis on the need to complete comprehensive planning before any new development. Unfortunately, not all areas have community groups as strong as the GPCA to question development. Really, the only "smart" growth is to end ALL development in undevloped areas and encourage redevelopment of urban areas with higher density, pedestrian friendly communities. |
| RentedMule |
posted 4/17/04 11:03 AM
Before central planning Granite was a rather diverse little town. A large range of incomes, a substantial Black precence, shopping available, and yes, even employment! One could walk to the store or to work, and many did. Recreation was available, and rather visible. With the exception of the Edrich Industrial Empire,"business" now seems to be a dirty word. Though some "home" business activity exists is has to be discreet since those needed goods and services are now considered criminal. Some rental housing exists, but not enough so accomodate the young and lower income needs. All zoning decisions are based now on the middle class model of $300.000.00 large lot single family homes. Is there a single ball field or basketball court? Gone are the days when 10 or more children could walk or bicycle to a site and spend an entire day involved in sporting activities beyond the supervision of adults. Now, children are driven miles away to a fancy facility to structured activities all arranged by well meaning adults. Central planning does work in that it can create a bedroom community that is desired by a lot of folk. Regardless of any particular political "laedership", the culture has spoken and central planning is the path we are on. Not to fret! It's a done deal. The only battles are in the details. Thanks, Mule |
|
Fluffy (Moderator) |
posted 4/18/04 0:33 AM
About six years ago I was working in Catonsville. I happened to meet a pair of gentlemen who claimed that they were studying wetlands and wilderness areas in Baltimore County. When I asked if they were intending to survey the Granite area they told me they were not because this part of baltimore county was considered a "sacrifice zone". I'm not sure what that was supposed to mean but it may be the reason all these interesting development projects seem to come our way. |
|
|