|
| Author | Topic: Cribbage |
| pete |
posted 5/26/07 3:44 PM
Have played the computer 10 times over 4 days. I have been dealt a double run 4 times in 60+ hands; the computer has been dealt double runs 30+ times not including turn up. I like a challenge but it gets a bit depressing knowing your opponent will score 2 or three hands of 16+ every game. Also, is there a way to count one for his knob. I have tried all combinations to no avail |
| MeggieSoft Games |
posted 5/26/07 5:06 PM
The Nob is scored automatically. The deal is random; which means uneven streaks can occur. |
| Joe |
posted 5/30/07 9:10 PM
I am having the same problem. Despite being an experienced player i am being trounced by the computer opponent who is dealt at least 4 double run hands per game to my one or none. Have just played 12 games back to back and computer was dealt on average 40 points more than me each game, not including turn up. |
| Sarah |
posted 6/11/07 9:56 PM
I have to agree with the other guys here. I have just played 15 hands against the computer and lost all but one. I started keeping scores and found that the computer was dealt at least 35 points more than me in 12 out of 14 hands. I know there are always streaks but this seems more than just good/bad luck. Do the odds even out if I buy the game rather than evaluate it? |
| MeggieSoft Games |
posted 6/11/07 10:05 PM
The deal is random, and there is no difference between evaluation and registered mode in this respect. The crib discards are carefully calculated using methods described in the help file - these aim to result in the strongest possible hand for play. You may exchange cards with the opponent before discarding when it is your turn to discard first. This will prove that the opponent will still optimize its hand to the strongest possible. |
| Ray |
posted 7/4/07 9:45 PM
I also have to agree. The computer is definitely being dealt better cards. I lost two games in a row by 121 to 120 after being way behind (computer seemed to have every card it needed no matter what I played) and making a 'spectacular' comeback. How 'exciting.' How about making the game realistic instead of 'exciting.' |
| Nick |
posted 10/12/07 4:54 AM
yes i agree there is no way you can beat thr conputer player and am glad there is no difference between evaluate and member as now i dont have to bother joining no point cant win random dealing i dont think so |
| Nick |
posted 10/12/07 5:11 AM
i see that you have stopped replying to the complaints i also notice that all queries are complaints i hope you are spending your time re writing the programme as i think you have got it a bit wrong as all players cant be as bad as each other and lets hope you can write an honest answer for a change |
| Winterlight |
posted 4/2/08 3:29 PM
Just wanna note how much fun your versionof Cribbage is. I've been playing your500 Rummy for years and saw that you had Cribbage. Its a great version, like500 Rummy it will either play gently orgo for blood. Great interface with zerolearning curve, you can just get on withthe game. Your legacy in the realm ofpc card games is secure. ^_^ |
|
|